Legal Ethics (presented by Christopher Hopkins) at NBI Estate Administration Boot Camp

Ethics

A special thank you to NBI for inviting me to speak about legal ethics at their “Estate Administration Boot Camp” in Hollywood, Florida this year.

There is still time to register or get the audio CLE, here.

Some (unusual) ethical issues we covered:

Statistics on Florida Bar disciplinary actions (what are your chances of being Bar Complainted?)

Can you ask your client for a gift?

To whom do you owe a duty as escrow agent?

How do you notify clients when you leave a law firm?

Can you lie to a Bar investigator?

Can you tell a Bar officer to F*** off?

Can you appear before a judge who is your Facebook friend?

Can you rely on a legal ethics iPhone app?

Can you threaten another lawyer with a Bar complaint?

Can you be drunk at a CLE?

You can test your skills in the 11-part questions and answers, here.

1st Amendment
Florida Statute Criminalizes School Shooting & Bombing Threats – How Does Law Enforcement Locate People Who Post Online Threats? (O.P-G. v. Florida)

Two days after the Parkland School shooting in Broward County, a middle school student twenty miles away in Miami Lakes, Florida decided to post on YouTube the following: “I[’]m going to shoot my school in [F]lorida[.] [I’]m only 13[.] I got bull[ied] and [I’]m getting my revenge with my guns[.] …

Data Breach
Christopher Hopkins Discusses Cybersecurity & Technology for Lawyers At Law Firm Leaders Summit

I was invited to speak today in Tampa about cybersecurity and technology for lawyers at the Law Firm Leaders Summit conference. I presented to both “small firm” and “large firm” tracks at the seminar. We covered: Getting hacked on public wifi Phishing, Spearfishing and other hacks Ransomware U.S. Government’s “NIT” …

1st Amendment
The First Amendment and the Hurdles to Obtain an Injunction in Florida for Social Media Cyberstalking (Derek Warren Logue v. Lauren Frances Book)

A Florida trial court entered an injunction for stalking against the appellant for, among other things, posting a picture of the appellee’s house with her address, a song video with obscene title and lyrics, and a cartoon depicting the appellee with an obscene reference. The appellant filed an appeal, claiming …