Can A Plaintiff Be Asked in Deposition Whether They Previously Consulted Other Lawyers?

Ethics

Florida’s Third District Court of Appeal issued an opinion in Michelle Coffey-Garcia v. South Miami Hospital, Inc. regarding whether defendants, seeking to prove that the statute of limitation was blown, could ask the plaintiff “who, when and why” questions about consulting prior lawyers.  The appellate court quashed part of the writ and the mixed result likely will not entirely please either plaintiff nor defense counsel.

As a technical point, the Court noted there is a difference between the evidentiary rule of “attorney client privilege” (disclosure in judicial and administrative hearings) and the ethics rule of “client-lawyer confidentiality” (disclosure outside of those hearings).  Here, the issue related to the evidentiary rule in Florida Statute 90.502(2).

Here’s what the plaintiff had to answer:

  • The fact of consultation or employment of counsel (“when and with whom she consulted for the general purpose of discussing possible legal remedies stemming from her daughter’s condition does not, on this record, implicate the attorney-client privilege”);
  • The general subject matter (or the general purpose) of the representation is not privileged; and
  • What she learned at various points in time concerning the nature and potential causes of her daughter’s condition from sources other than the lawyers she consulted.

The plaintiff does not have to answer:

  • Reasons why she sought out legal counsel and any subsequent counsel.

The court noted that the defense’s necessity for such information nor does undue hardship overcome the privilege.

 

 

Ethics
Florida Supreme Court Allows Judges to be Facebook Friends With Lawyers But Four Justices Disagree With the Practice (“I write to strongly urge judges not to participate in Facebook”)

The Florida Supreme Court resolved a conflict between two intermediate appellate courts when it determined that a judge-lawyer “Facebook friend” relationship, alone, was not enough to warrant recusal of the judge.  The Court deemed its position was the majority position around the country.  However, four justices noted that caution, if …

E-discovery
NBI CLE: Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Email, and Smartphone Evidence (Florida)

Special thanks to National Business Institute (NBI) for hosting this 2-day CLE seminar in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. You can find the seminar information (and download the audio) here. My topics included: Apps and Emerging Technology You Must Know Preserving Electronic Evidence and Avoiding Spoliation Social Media Cases Metadata Made Simple …

Evidence
In Butoh Dance / Suicide Case, Court Rules that Emails & Skype into Florida Create Jurisdiction Over Katsura Kan, Dance Instructor

Can Florida obtain personal jurisdiction over someone just because he/she sent emails or Skyped with another person in Florida?  In the unusual case of Tibor Stern, as personal representative of the Estate of Sharon Stern v. Terugoshi Kotoura a/k/a Katsura Kan, the answer is yes. The Facts of the Case …