Former Conspiracy Theory Professor James Tracy Sues FAU

1st Amendment

A former tenured professor at Florida Atlantic University (FAU) in Boca Raton, Florida sued the school, president, trustees, as well as his former union and union representatives for inter alia wrongful termination and breach of contract premised upon First Amendment claims and a dispute over signing an “Outside Activity” form.

This may sound fairly un-newsworthy outside of the academic world until you factor in that the plaintiff is James Tracy, who espouses that the Sandy Hook, CT shooting was staged.  Specifically, he is quoted as claiming that parents of the murdered children are lying and profiting.  He has been quoted as claiming that the Boston Marathon bombing was a “false flag.”  Given his controversial opinions, Wikipedia has a fairly even-handed bio for Tracy, here.

The lawsuit, James Tracy v. Florida Atlantic University Board of Trustees et al., is here.

We’ll address the legal arguments in this case once FAU files a response.  Their response is due in early May.

Notably, the media coverage has been focused on Tracy’s bombastic theories.  While the Complaint makes the allegation that he was terminated due to his beliefs, the legal arguments appear to largely center on whether it was constitutional to fire him for failure to follow a revised university policy regarding completing a form which requires professors to describe their outside activities.

As this case unfolds, it is important to internally silence your own agreement or disagreement with the content of Tracy’s speech so that you might fairly and even-handedly ascertain if there is a viable constitution, contractual, or tortious claim at issue.

A few items of interest which you might not have seen in the Palm Beach Post or Sun Sentinal coverage:

  • The syllabus for Professor’s Tracy’s former “Culture of Conspiracy” class is here.  The course began with a discussion of the JFK assassination and ends with the screening of “9/11 Press for Truth,” an independent film which appears to have received limited attention.  Of note, the reading material for this class was, not surprisingly, heavily-tilted towards the alternative and conspiratorial: the list of authors and sources include Fletcher Proudy, “JFK” movie director Oliver Stone, and Jim Marrs, among others (In his book Alien Agenda, Marrs claims to have “uncovered compelling new evidence regarding extraterrestrials-that alien life forms have not only visited our planet in the past, but are among us right now”).
  • Tracy contributed to a 400+ book “Nobody Died at Sandy Hook” which you can download here.  You will need to download it — the authors claim it was banned by Amazon (unconfirmed – I could not find a source other than the authors’ press release).

We’ll continue to follow this lawsuit and provide links to the pleadings.

Image credit: NBC Miami

1st Amendment
3D Gun Printing: Bad Idea the First Amendment Likely Will Permit

I read with interest Thomas Julin‘s article, “Weaponized First Amendment Does Not Protect Blueprints for Weapons” in the Daily Business Review. The link is here. Tom sets out the current status of the debate, cites an authority, and concludes that the First Amendment “will not protect publication of information for …

Constitutional Law
South Dakota v Wayfair – A Dormant Commerce Clause Case Will Likely Hit Intenet Etsy and Ebay Sellers with State Sales Tax

If you sell enough on Etsy and eBay, you may find yourself having to report sales tax in your buyers’ states. A recent opinion from the U.S. Supreme Court, South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. et al., is likely going to lead to new hassles for internet merchants, including possibly individual …

1st Amendment
Trump Cannot Block Twitter Users: Knight First Amendment Institute et al. v. Trump et al.

A federal judge in the Southern District of New York has issued a 75-page Memorandum and Order concluding that President Trump cannot block Twitter users because aspects of his @realdonaldtrump account is a government-controlled forum and Trump’s viewpoint-based exclusion of the plaintiffs from that designated public forum is proscribed by …