Can You Sue the South Florida Fair in West Palm Beach?

Causes of Action

According to a recent appellate court opinion, a person can sue the South Florida Fair for personal injuries, but only up to the sovereign immunity limit.

In South Florida Fair and Palm Beach County Expositions, Inc. v. Widley Joseph, the appellant (Joseph) was seriously injured at the fair and sued both the South Florida Fair and its operator, W.G. Wade Shows, Inc.  The latter entity was dismissed, which we’ll discuss below.  The Fair sought summary judgment claiming it had limited immunity as a state instrumentality.

The opinion covers some detailed legal principles in Florida Statute 768.28(5) and Florida Statutes Chapter 616.  Essentially, the former statute provides a cap on liability for state actors (aka “limited sovereign immunity”) and Chapter 616 discusses how the Florida State Fair is, indeed, a state actor.  As the opinion points out, “[o]f course, the South Florida Fair is not the Florida State Fair.”  However, Chapter 616 shows us that local and regional fairs are heavily regulated (even their money is “perpetually public property”).  The kicker is Florida Statute 616.19 which says that a fair association (here, the South Florida Fair) “shall be recognized by the state as equal in dignity to the Florida State Fair…”  The Court read that to mean that the South Florida Fair is entitled to the same limited sovereign immunity.

It is unclear whether the Plaintiff in this case was able to collect some money from the operator before dismissing them.  That might be one avenue.  The other option is to proceed against the South Florida Fair, but only up to the limited sovereign immunity amount of $200,000, unless a plaintiff then pursues a claims bill.

While the underlying case may be a personal injury matter, the relatively recent changes in Chapter 616 as well as the complexity of dealing with private and quasi-state actors may be above the ability of a run-of-the-mill injury firm.

Image credit: Waterfront Properties

Causes of Action
Two Slip-And-Fall Cases from Third DCA Give Instruction on “Transitory Substance” Litigation Strategy Under Florida Statute 768.0755

Two decisions regarding slip-and-fall litigation from Florida’s Third DCA (Miami) provide some instruction on how to litigate “transitory substance” cases under Florida Statute 768.0755, particularly “constructive notice” cases.  In both instances, summary judgment was upheld which is unusual in negligence cases.  The decisions provide insight into maintenance contracts, stacking inferences, …

Causes of Action
5348
Sending E-Mails To, Sharing Files With Tourist Does Not Create Florida Jurisdiction

Business travelers and vacationers typically send work-related emails while on the road.  It also is not unusual to share files (or access to files) while traveling.  But can that lead to jurisdiction over you in a wayward state? According to Swanky Apps LLC v. Daren Horning and Roony Invest & …

Social Media
3170
New Rules for Juror Internet Use in Florida Criminal Cases

The Florida Supreme Court issued an opinion last Thursday approving new standard jury instruction 1.001 (Introduction) which, according to the Comment, deals with jurors’ “communication with other and outside research.” If there is any question as to the serious nature of juror internet use — either tweeting/Facebooking about service or …