Christopher Hopkins discusses First Amendment & Social Media at University of Miami Law School

1st Amendment

A special thanks to professor Jan Jacobowitz for inviting me to speak about the First Amendment and Social Media as part of her Social Media and the Law class at the University of Miami Law School.

Some of the cases we covered include:

Elonis v US

US v Elonis

In Re Honorable Michelle Slaughter

Bell v Itawamba (2014 and 2015 opinions)

Fox v. Hamptons at Metrowest Condo. Assoc.

Reno v. ACLU

Packingham v North Carolina

Davison v Loudon County

J.A.W. v Florida

and the pending First Amendment cases in front of the US Supreme Court:

National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becera

Minnesota Voters Alliance v Mansky

Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado Civil Rights Commission

Janus v. American Federation

You can download the Powerpoint here.

Thanks again to professor Jacobowitz and her students!

Image credit: Law Dragon

Internet
When You See People Trying to Sue a Social Media Platform Because Their Account Was Suspended, It’s a Stunt (lessons of the CDA & Brittain v. Twitter)

A number of politicians, activists, and others who feel aggrieved after their Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and/or YouTube content has been removed or their accounts suspended have taken to the courts to sue the social media platforms with claims that they are being singled out, muzzled, or their free speech is …

Injunction
Casual Sexual Relationships and Florida’s Injunction Against Dating Violence (versus other injunctions)

When seeking an injunction in Florida to prevent someone from contacting you, pay careful attention to which statute best applies. This is the (unfortunate) lesson of Tyler Sumners v. Lindsey Thompson. After meeting on Craigslist, the parties had a four year consensual sexual relationship punctuated by periods of time when …

1st Amendment
“Valid Grounds for Employment Action” Deemed Not Enough for Stalking Injunction under F.S. 784.048 (Klenk v. Ransom)

Florida’s First District Court of Appeal held today that a respondent’s behavior may be enough for an “employment action” (presumably, for termination due to sexual harassment) but, in this case, was not enough for the “exacting standard” for an injunction against stalking under Florida Statute 748.048. The case is Joseph …