Third DCA Pharmacy Negligence Case Leaves Florida (Still) Without an ESI Discovery Appellate Opinion

E-discovery

In the case of Walgreen Co. and Holiday CVS, LLC v Jonathan Rubin, two national pharmacy chains were somehow convinced by their counsel to appeal an adverse discovery production order despite the fact that the lawyers failed to get (basic) affidavits establishing that production costs were unreasonably burdensome. In the end, we are left with an enemic decision that neither interprets Florida’s (somewhat new) ESI standards nor clarifies basic Florida precedent regarding writs of certiorari from discovery orders. The court could have stopped at “you have no sworn evidence” so you lose your “unreasonable burden” discovery appeal.

At discounted rates, defendant Walgreens claimed it would cost $21,000 to produce 45 employee files in a wrongful death case. They sought to establish that burden through an unsworn statement by… a paralegal. Co-defendant CVS, through its lawyers, joined the “overly-burdensome” argument with… no testimony and no cost estimate. Again, in the plain absence of any evidence, this could have been decided in a sentence or a PCA.

There is undeniable-but-dated precedent in Florida that discovery which is burdensome “but not destructive” is not sufficiently egregious to warrant cert review. That precedent, however, hails from 1987 which is long before the advent, breadth, and expense of ESI discovery which has yet to be addressed in Florida law (case in point, PACER only dates back to 1988 and look at that interface…). To try to topple that precedent, however, you need to get some evidence of burden — that didn’t happen here.

The defendants (now appellants) tried to argue that a recent Florida Supreme Court case, Worley v. Central Florida Young Men’s Christian Association, had implicitly or explicitly had reversed the “financial ruin test.” Again, it would be nice to start that discussion with some evidence. The Third DCA buttressed their denial-for-lack-of-evidence by pointing out that the instant case didn’t fit the standards of Worley if the defendants had, in the first place, properly set up the appeal.

The financial ruin test should be reconsidered, or at least partially receded from, in light of the ESI standards and the broadened standards of discovery… but that will not happened under these circumstances.

The Florida Daily Business Review covered the details in this article.

image credit: Cleveland County Public Health Center

Evidence
In Butoh Dance / Suicide Case, Court Rules that Emails & Skype into Florida Create Jurisdiction Over Katsura Kan, Dance Instructor

Can Florida obtain personal jurisdiction over someone just because he/she sent emails or Skyped with another person in Florida?  In the unusual case of Tibor Stern, as personal representative of the Estate of Sharon Stern v. Terugoshi Kotoura a/k/a Katsura Kan, the answer is yes. The Facts of the Case …

E-discovery
Social Media Discovery in Florida After Nucci v. Target

Litigators and the courts continue to put heavy emphasis on social media discovery but, surprisingly, the case law has not significantly developed in Florida (or really around the country) since the 2015 case of Nucci v. Target.  However, the few cases that have arisen in the last two years are …

E-discovery
“Social Media Discovery – Case Law Update & Strategies” – Florida Tech CLE at Palm Beach Bar presented by Christopher Hopkins

This one hour session, which you view live or via web (even after the fact), explains the key published opinions in Florida regarding social media discovery.  In addition to that, attendees will see the discovery requests which worked AND failed as well as obtain samples of up-to-date discovery requests.  Finally, …